Panetta

www.TheCitizensWhoCare.org

Leon Panetta interview with Brian Wilson - Video and Transcript

Related issues: Waterboarding, Geneva Conventions, Torture

Leon Panetta interview with Brian Wilson - Video and Transcript
This is the interview with Panetta regarding the issue of Waterboarding and the killing of Osama ben Laden.

Clay Dalrymple said Leon Panetta "admitted enhanced interrogation was one of the many ways information was gathered to get bin Laden. Waterboarding was a part of the method - not torture." While Bush chose to remove the U.S. from the Geneva Convention on torture, nonetheless, waterboarding is seen by the Geneva Conventions and most countries as torture. The definition of torture.

Transcript and video of an interview with NBC's Brian Williams and CIA Director Leon Panetta. Starting at 7:50 through 9:40 in focuses on waterboarding. Scroll to 7:50-9:40.

Williams: I'd like to ask you about the sourcing on the intel that ultimatly led to this successful attack. Can you confirm that it was as a result of waterboarding that we learned what we needed to learn to go after bin Laden.

Panetta: You know, Brian, in the intelligence business you work from a lot of sources of information and that was true here. We had a multiple source, a multiple series of sources that provided information with regards to this situation. Clearly some of it came from detainees, interigation of detainees but we also had information from other sources as well. From Signent intelligence, from imagry, other sources that we had assets on the ground, It was a combination of all of that that ultimately we were able to put together that lead us to that compound. So, it is a little difficult to say that it was due just to one source of information that we got.

Williams: Turned around the other way, are you denying that waterboarding, was in part, among the tactics used to extract the intelligence that led to this successful mission.

Panetta: No I think that some of the detainees clearly were, they used these enhanced interigation techniques against some of these detainees but I'm also saying that, you know, the debate about whether we would have gotten the same information through other approaches I think is always is going to be an open question.

Williams: So, finer point, one final time, enhanced interigation techniques, which has always be kind of a handy ufimism in these post 911 years, that it includes waterboarding.

Panetta: That's correct.

Video Source: today.msnbc.msn.com/id/42880435/ns/today-today_news/t/cia-chief-waterboarding-aided-bin-laden-raid

CIA chief: Waterboarding aided bin Laden raid
Attorney general tells Congress that operation into Pakistan was legal

NBC, msnbc.com and news services updated 5/3/2011 8:51:07 PM ET 2011-05-04T00:51:07

Intelligence garnered from waterboarded detainees was used to track down al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden and kill him, CIA Chief Leon Panetta told NBC News on Tuesday. (See the transcript to determine for yourself if this statement is true or not. See below how NBC used their own words to imply - much like FOX News, but FOX actually reformates the video to say what the interviewees didn't say. FOX are experts in producing fabricated videos. You decide.)

.."Enhanced interrogation techniques" were used to extract information that led to the mission's success, Panetta said during an interview with anchor Brian Williams. Those techniques included waterboarding, he acknowledged.

Panetta, who in a 2009 CIA confirmation hearing declared "waterboarding is torture and it's wrong," said Tuesday that debate about its use will continue.

"Whether we would have gotten the same information through other approaches I think is always gonna be an open question," Panetta said.

"In the intelligence business you work from a lot of sources of information and that was true here," Panetta said. "We had a multiple source — a multiple series of sources — that provided information with regards to the situation. Clearly some of it came from detainees and the interrogation of detainees but we also had information from other sources as well."

Panetta's comments hours after Attorney General Eric Holder defended as lawful Tuesday the intelligence gathering and raid that resulted in the death of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden.

Under questioning by a committee member, Holder said he did not know whether information helpful to the search for bin Laden was gained through harsh interrogation techniques of al-Qaida suspects.

Rep. Dan Lungren, R-Calif., asked whether the bin Laden mission might have been illegal if it was aided by legally questionable interrogation tactics of prisoners at CIA sites around the globe.

The following is an exchange between Holder and Lungren during the hearing.

Lungren: "Can you tell us for the public record whether we can therefore be assured that any intelligence which led to the capture and killing of Osama bin Laden was not the result of enhanced interrogation techniques?"

Holder: "Well I think that, as has been indicated by other administration spokesmen, there was a mosaic of sources that led to the identification of the people that led to ..."

Lungren: "I understand that, but were any pieces of that mosaic the result of enhanced interrogation techniques?"

Holder: "I do not know."

Lungren: "If that were the case, would it make the action that we took against Osama bin Laden illegal?"

Holder: "No. I mean, I think that in terms of the attenuation, to the extent that it was assumed that that were true, the attenuation between those acts that might have been problematic and the action that was taken just two days ago was sufficiently long so that the action would still be considered legal."

'Controversial interrogation'

U.S. officials say one of the key clues that led to bin Laden was a thread of information about an al-Qaida courier. That thread, they say, may have come from Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed or from the so-called 20th hijacker, Mohammad al-Qahtani.

.Authorities acknowledge both Khalid Sheik Mohammad and Mohammad al-Qahtani had been subjected to enhanced interrogation, a policy authorized by former President George W. Bush.

"We used this technique on three people, captured a lot of people and used it on three. We gained value; information to protect the country. And it was the right thing to do as far as I'm concerned," Bush said in a 2010 interview.

But was it harsh interrogation that led to the critical information? The identity and whereabouts of the courier came to light only years later, after the enhanced interrogation had stopped.

"The road to bin Laden began with waterboarding," Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., House Homeland Security Chairman, said in an NBC News interview in which he asserted that waterboarding is a "moral imperative" that "saves lives."

"I use the example of Sept 10th, 2001, if we had captured [9/11 airplane hijacker] Mohammed Atta and we knew he was going to kill thousands of Americans but we didn't know when or where, are we saying now you wouldn't hold his head under water to save 3000 lives?"

Critics say there's no way to know if enhanced interrogation methods led to that one crucial piece of intelligence.

"To reduce this to the idea that one piece of fact here or there came from enhanced interrogation techniques and their use is really misleading the American public," said Karen Greenberg, NYU Center On Law And Security.

Administration officials say it was multiple sources of intelligence and years of patient work that eventually led to bin Laden.

"Those who believe enhanced interrogation techniques are incredibly successful are going to be out there publicly advocating for why they work and why we should continue to use them. Others are going to say, well, they may have worked on this one occasion, you can't draw a broad sweeping conclusion that they always work," said Roger Cressey, NBC News terrorism analyst.
Source: today.msnbc.msn.com/id/42880435/ns/today-today_news/t/cia-chief-waterboarding-aided-bin-laden-raid/

 
©2007-2011, www.TheCitizensWhoCare.org//panetta.html